A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1351 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1352 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on United States v. Japan Import Co. · Hoyt v. United States · Mutual Supply Co. v. United States · Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United States · A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. We remand. 2 There are three issues. The first is whether inclusion of the imported merchandise in concessions to the Japanese in our 1955 trade agreement with Japan made improper its appraisement on the basis of the American selling price of like or similar domestic articles. The second issue, which we reach because we agree with the conclusion below on the first issue, is whether the use of the U. S. Keds”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where imports are sufficiently similar to American goods to compete directly with them,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.