Gordon v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
55 F.3d 101 · 1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on White v. Shalala · Walker v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Ruppert v. Bowen · Radio Today, Inc. v. Westwood One, Inc. · 671 F. Supp. 151 - Ruppert v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... decided that it will determine [with respect to SSI applicants or recipients in the Second Circuit] that an applicant or recipient did not receive an ‘actual economic benefit’ from a rental subsidy when the monthly amount of rent required to be paid equals or exceeds the presumed maximum value described in 20 C.F.R. Section 416.1140(a)(1) (one-third of the Federal benefit rate plus the $20 general income exclusion). If the required amount of rent is less than the presumed maximum value, we will impute as in-kind support and maintenance the difference between the required amount of rent and either the presumed maximum value or the current market rental value, whichever is less.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ellis v. Apfel“APA”) in order to be effective. This argument is frivolous. The general rule on acquiescence rulings is that although they”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.