Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 F.3d 407 - Arrow v. Gambler's Supply, Inc.

Arrow v. Gambler's Supply, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

55 F.3d 407 · 1995

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably United States v. Union Electric Co. (1995), Solid Waste Agency v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (1996)

15 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1701995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 81

Relies on National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New York · Thompson v. Boggs · Purnell v. City of Akron · Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota · Bottoms v. Dresser Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As pertinent here, Rule 24 provides as follows: (a) Intervention of Right. On timely motion, the court must permit anyone to intervene who: (2) claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action, and is so situated that disposing of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the mov-ant’s ability to protect its interest, unless existing parties adequately represent that interest.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “how far the litigation had progressed at the time of the motion for intervention, the prospective intervenor's prior knowledge of the pending action, the reason for the delay in seeking intervention, and the likelihood of prejudice to the parties in the action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Dan Glickman, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, Appellant/cross-Appellee. Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Southeast Dairy Farmers Association and United Dairymen of Arizona, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. National Farmers Organization ("Nfo"), Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Association of Dairy Cooperatives in the Northeast ("Adcne"), Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Texas Association of Dairymen Dairy Producers of New Mexico Lone Star Milk Producers, L.C. And Premier Milk Producers, Inc., Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. National Farmers Organization, Inc. (Nfo) and Association of Dairy Cooperatives in the Northeast, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, a Non-Profit Minnesota Corporation, Individually, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Bill Dropik, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Chester Kolstad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Greg Radermacher, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Arnold Ness, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Fredrick J. Bianchi, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Marlon Restad, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Delbert Mandelko, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated John Fischer, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Lee Johnston, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated Leslie Kyllo, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated James Muzzy, Individually, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries Arkansas Livestock and Poultry Commission Colorado Department of Agriculture Georgia Department of Agriculture Kentucky Department of Agriculture Maine Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Resources Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce New Hampshire Department of Agriculture, Markets and Food New Mexico Department of Agriculture North Carolina Department of Agriculture South Carolina Department of Agriculture State of Vermont and Washington Department of Agriculture · Minnesota Milk Producers Ass'n v. Glickman
  3. “1) the party must have a recognized interest in the subject matter of the litigation; 2) that interest must be one that might be impaired by the disposition of the litigation; and 3) the interest must not be adequately protected by the existing parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.