King v. Champion’s Empirical Analysis
55 F.3d 522 · 1995
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Sumner v. Mata · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · Harris v. Champion · Taylor v. McKeithen · Harris v. Champion
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is nothing inherently objectionable in the Oklahoma court's use of summary opinions in unpublished cases,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burleson v. Saffle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.