Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

55 F. App'x 168

Simuel v. Curry

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-01-27

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-01-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Dontez Lamont Simuel appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Simuel v. Curry, No. CA-02-636-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 21, 2002, entered Oct. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/55/fappx/168 · .json · Public domain