Foster v. Painter

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-01-27

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-01-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Hartzel Ray Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Foster v. Painter, No. CA-99-48-2 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.