Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

55 F. App'x 213

Henson v. Angelone

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-02-05

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-02-05

PER CURIAM.

¶1 George Henson, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting his motion to supplement the record in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition but denying further relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Henson v. Angelone, No. CA-01-59 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/55/fappx/213 · .json · Public domain