Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 FLA 834 - Koon v. Koon

Koon v. Koon’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1959
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1959

10 state decisions

30190819101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Camp Phosphate Co. v. Anderson · Keil v. West · Williams v. Clyatt · Rivas v. Summers · Buckmaster v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It would seem that as a general rule a cross-bill in a partition suit is neither necessary nor proper.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.