Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 FRD 269 - In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation

In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2007 · most notably In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation (1996), In re Master Key Antitrust Litigation (1975)

2 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

1401972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 12 (§ 1 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 15A (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 18 (§ 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1407

Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Kahan v. Rosenstiel · Miller v. Mackey International, Inc. · Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co. · State of West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.