Sullenger v. Baecher’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2010
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Moelle v. Sherwood · State ex rel. MacKenzie v. Casteel · Stephenson v. Boody · Smith v. McClain · Armstrong v. Hufty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Part of Sur. 17, Town one Range Ten containing 100 acres in Johnson Township, Knox County, Indiana.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberts v. Feitz“Pt. lot 17, Township 1, Range 10, acres 100. Johnson Township, Knox County, Indiana.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberts v. Feitz“All survey 17 Township 1, Range 10, 100 acres, Johnson Township.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberts v. Feitz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.