Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 INDAPP 547 - Euler v. Euler

Euler v. Euler’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Mesker v. Bishop (1913), 90 Ind. App. 227 - Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Rushton (1925)

48 state decisions

27019131920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. Beckett · Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. Ramsey · Mescall v. Tully · Vulcan Iron Works Co. v. Electro Magnetic Gold Mining Co. · Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When final settlement of an estate shall have been made, and the executor or administrator discharged, any person interested in the estate, not appearing at the final settlement, nor personally-summoned to attend the same, may have such settlement, or so much thereof as affects him adversely, set aside, and the estate reopened, by filing in the court in which the settlement was made, within three [3] years from the date of such settlement, his petition, particularly setting forth the illegality, fraud or mistake in such settlement, or in the prior proceedings in the administration of the estate, affecting him adversely. The executor or administrator of the estate, and any of the creditors, heirs, devisees or legatees of the decedent adversely interested in the matters alleged in such petition shall be made defendants thereto, and shall be entitled to such notice of the pendency thereof as is required to be given under the Code of Civil Procedure to defendants in ordinary actions. If any person interested in an estate shall, at the time of the final settlement thereof, be under legal disabilities, he may file such petition within three [3] years from the time of the removal or cessation of such disability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.