55 Kan. App. 2d 419 - State v. Lindemuth’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Hilt · State v. Williams · State v. Hendrix · State v. Dupree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is justified in the use of force against another when and to the extent that it appears to such person and such person reasonably believes that such use of force is necessary to prevent . . . such other's unlawful entry into . . . such person's . . . place of work . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lindemuth“A requested jury instruction should be given when there is sufficient evidence that a rational fact-finder could use to find for [the party] on that theory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.