55 Kan. App. 2d 473 - Baker v. Hayden’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Any person may make abstracts or obtain copies of any public record to which such person has access under this act. If copies are requested, the public agency may require a written request and advance payment of the prescribed fee. A public agency shall not be required to provide copies of radio or recording tapes or discs, video tapes or films, pictures, slides, graphics, illustrations or similar audio or visual items or devices, unless such items or devices were shown or played to a public meeting of the governing body thereof, but the public agency shall not be required to provide such items 36 or devices which are copyrighted by a person other than the public agency.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Baker v. Hayden

2. “court reporters that permits counsel to access electronic recordings to determine the accuracy of the prepared transcript stands in stark contrast to a broad rule enacted by the Kansas Supreme Court that specifically prohibits and restricts public access to all electronic recordings of proceedings under the [Act].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Baker v. Hayden

3. “[W]e find no indication from the plain and unambiguous language used in [Rule 362] from which we can conclude that our Supreme Court intended to prohibit or restrict public access to electronically recorded hearings of open court proceedings.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Baker v. Hayden