55 Kan. App. 2d 579 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Engelhardt · State v. Kelly · State v. Irving · State v. Frye
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Further, Harris' circumstances are unique because he had participated in a bench trial pro se in case No. 2015CR275 immediately before the preliminary hearing in this case. Given his insistence that the judge hear the trial and the fact he had defended himself in a bench trial during the pendency of this case, the particular facts and circumstances of this case show Harris had a sufficient understanding of the difference between a jury trial and bench trial. His waiver was knowingly and voluntarily made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“I chose a bench trial because it ain't going to be mostly about deciding what the law is, laws and facts, something the jury don't get to do, as you're well aware of.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“[b]eyond these matters, defense counsel is responsible for strategical and tactical decisions like preparation, scheduling, and the type of defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.