55 Kan. App. 2d 595 - State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State v. Ward · State v. Ivory · State v. Plummer · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If recklessness suffices to establish an element, that element also is established if a person acts knowingly or intentionally.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“would tend to cause any lesser included offense with a lower culpable mental state than the crime charged to become factually appropriate regardless of whether the facts or the evidence support the applicable mental state and despite the differences in the culpable mental state definitions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“According to K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-5202 [a]-[c], the State here satisfied the knowingly element in the knowing aggravated battery charges by proving the defendant intentionally committed the aggravated batteries.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chavez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.