Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 MASSAPPCT 119 - Commonwealth v. Newell

Commonwealth v. Newell’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Saferian · Commonwealth v. Freeman · Commonwealth v. Flebotte · Commonwealth v. Satterfield · Commonwealth v. Yesilciman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “considerable discretion in framing jury instructions, both in determining the precise phraseology used and the appropriate degree of elaboration.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Under Massachusetts law, appellate courts 'evaluate the charge as a whole, looking for what meaning a reasonable juror could put to the words of the trial judge.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the question is whether the jury instructions created a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.