Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

55 Mo. App. 147

Watson v. Barbee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1893

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1893-11-20

..Appeal from the Bay Circuit Court. — Hon. Elbridge J. Broadus, Judge. (1) No appeal allowed by tbe justice shall be dismissed for want of an affidavit or recognizance, or because the affidavit or recognizance made or given is ■defective or insufficient, if “the appellant, or some person for him, will, before the motion to dismiss is •determined, file in the appellate court the affidavit required.” Revised Statutes, 1889, sec. 6340.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1908

2 state decisions

Relies on Sprague v. Western Home Insurance

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1893-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ellison, J.

¶1This action was begun before a jus- ' tice of the peace. Plaintiff lost the case in that court, and in appealing to the circuit court he filed an affidavit with the justice which omitted to state whether the appeal was from the merits or matter of costs. A motion was made by defendant in the circuit court to-dismiss the appeal for such omission. Before the-motion to dismiss was passed upon, plaintiff offered to. file a perfect affidavit, but the motion was nevertheless, sustained, and plaintiff comes here.

¶2The trial court doubtless sustained such motion,, notwithstanding plaintiff offered a perfected or amended, affidavit on the authority of Whitehead v. Cole, 49 Mo. App. 426, wherein it was held that the circuit court, acquired no jurisdiction of the subject-matter when the-affidavit for appeal was defective in the particular complained of in this case. In the case of Welch v. Railroad, decided at this term, the position taken in the-Whitehead case was disavowed. The judgment in this, case will, therefore, be reversed and the cause remanded..

All concur.
/55/moapp/147 · .json · Public domain