Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 N.M. 161 - State v. Ardovino

State v. Ardovino’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
October 2000
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2000 · most notably State v. Lott (1963), State v. Harris (1984)

30 state decisions

100195119601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Valdez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... sufficient to give the court and the defendant notice of what offense is intended to be charged.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It will be noted that in the case at . bar the information does not refer to the section of the statute creating the offense, and consequently subsection (2) of section 42-607, supra, cannot be invoked.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.