Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 N.M. 444 - Adams v. Cox

Adams v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 1988 · most notably Torres v. Village of Capitan (1978), Adams v. UNITED STEELWORKERS, ETC. (1982)

39 state decisions

1601951196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Medler v. Henry · Paulos v. Janetakos · Adams v. Cox · Lindauer Mercantile Co. v. Boyd · Adams v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To make a matter res judicata there must be a concurrence of the four conditions following, viz.: First, identity of the subject-matter; second, identity of cause of action; third, identity of persons and parties; and, fourth, identity in the quality of the persons for or against whom claim is made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.