Ferret v. Ferret’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably State v. Turnbow (1960), Brister v. Brister (1979)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lazar v. Superior Court · Golden v. Golden · Priestley v. Law Et Ux. · Mindlin v. Mindlin · Lord v. Lord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There follows the pertinent inquiry: Are the installment payments for the wife provided by the contract awards in lieu of alimony? If they are, and we are so convinced, then it follows as day the night that the trial court not only had the right but it was its bounden duty to inquire into the fairness and equitable nature of provisions made in the contract for the payment thereof. Nor was it to be denied this right by any technical rule of pleading. And the fact that upon such inquiry it may ascertain and provide lesser awards as alimony than the contract stipulates in no way mitigates against its right and duty to make the inquiry. Indeed, in ' reducing the amount of alimony installments stipulated in the contract the court may actually have advantaged the wife, if the husband is able to pay the lower award fixed in the decree and not the higher . one stipulated in the contract. “We think a fair appraisal of the settlement contract as a whole leaves little doubt that the payments in favor of the wife provided for in the contract were in discharge of the husband’s obligation to support and maintain her and, hence, were in lieu of alimony.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Scanlon v. Scanlon““ ‘11. That the contract attached to plaintiff’s complaint and marked Exhibit A is not an equitable adjustment of the property rights of the parties nor is it an equitable or fair adjustment of the matters set forth therein.’ ” “ ‘12. That the evidence with respect to community property belonging to the parties is either entirely lacking, or so meager that the Court is unable to make a finding thereon.’ ” “ ‘14. That the contract attached to plaintiff’s complaint and marked Exhibit Á should not be approved by the Court.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Scanlon v. Scanlon“All marriages celebrated beyond the limits of this state, which are valid according to the laws of the country wherein they were celebrated or contracted, shall be likewise valid in this state, and shall have the same force as if they had been celebrated in accordance with the laws in force in this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Leszinske v. Poole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.