Barry v. Manglass’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2018
8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a verdict on one claim necessarily negates an element of another cause of action.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The requirement of a timely exception is not merely a technicality. Its function `is to give the court and the opposing party the opportunity to correct an error in the conduct of the trial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the inconsistency had been raised, the trial court could have taken corrective action before the jury was discharged, such as resubmitting the matter to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.