Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Ohio App. 351 - Siegfried v. Everhart

55 Ohio App. 351 - Siegfried v. Everhart’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 1973
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1973

3 state decisions

2019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The language of the statute is plain and unambiguous and contains no such exception. The general rule is that, where the Legislature has made no exception to the positive terms of a statute, the presumption is that it intended to make none, and in such case it is not the province of a court to introduce an exception by construction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘ ‘ The owner or harborer of such dog shall be liable to a person damaged for the injury done.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.