Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Ohio App. 2d 59 - Epling v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.

55 Ohio App. 2d 59 - Epling v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
2
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably McHale v. W.B.S. Corp. (1982), 68 Ohio App. 3d 72 - Deoma v. Shaker Heights (1990)

5 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

220197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. Yellow Cab Co. · Hruska v. Severance Specialty, Inc. · Widmeyer v. Felton · 117 Ohio App. 183 - Rice v. Yellow Cab Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(4) When granted on the evidence. When a motion for a directed verdict has been properly made, and the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party, the court shall sustain the motion and direct a verdict for the moving party as to that issue.” See, also, O’Day v. Webb (1972), 29 Ohio St.2d 215, 220 , 58 O.O.2d 424, 427 , 280 N.E.2d 896, 899 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.