State v. Graddy’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

34 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Briefly summarized, this court is required to apply the federal constitutional standards of probable cause as pronounced by the United States Supreme Court. State v. Joseph [ (1971), 25 Ohio St.2d 95 , 54 O.O.2d 228 , 267 N.E.2d 125 ]. The recurring polestar and fundamental theme in such pronouncements is that the constitutional mandate of the Fourth Amendment that ‘no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause’ requires the interposing of a neutral magistrate between the officer and a citizen’s right of privacy (see Johnson v. United States [1948], 333 U.S. 10 , 68 S.Ct. 367 , 92 L.Ed. 436 ) * * * ”. State v. Graddy (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 132, 134 , 9 O.O.3d 109, 110 , 378 N.E.2d 723, 725 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Spikes

2. ““A corollary of this requirement is that, upon appellate review, only information brought to the attention of the magistrate may be considered. Aguilar v. Texas (1964), 378 U.S. 108, fn. 1 ; State v. Joseph (1971), 25 Ohio St. 2d 95 [ 54 O.O.2d 228 ]. Thus, the facts, adduced at the suppression hearing without objection, but not included in the affidavit, and relied upon by the state in this appeal, * * * may not be considered.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2 Ohio App. 3d 328 - State v. Daniels