Sackett v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Hidalgo Properties, Inc. v. Wachovia Mortgage Co. (1980), Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Grant (2007)
4 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. · Attorney General ex rel. Taylor v. Brown · Mason v. City of Ashland · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Malone · Uhlig v. Barnum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The alteration of a record may be shown by parol evidence; such evidence not being within the rule excluding evidence to vary the record, but for the purpose of showing that the record in question is not the true record that was actually made.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.