Forest v. Appelget’s Empirical Analysis
1916
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1936
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hill v. Williams · Welch v. Challen · Wynn v. Frost · Marshall v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Had an attorney accepted the employment and failed to have filed an answer, this would not have been sufficient to justify the vacating of the judgment on the -ground of unavoidable casualty or misfortune. Hill v. Williams, supra; Welch et al. v. Challen, 31 Kan. 696 , 3 Pac. 314 ; Wynn v. Frost, 6 Okla. 89 , 50 Pac. 184 ; Marshall v. Marshall, 7 Okla. 240 , 54 Pac. 461 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gavin v. Heath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.