State v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
1909
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 1977 · most notably 7 Ariz. App. 210 - State v. Cutshaw (1968), Labofish v. Berman (1932)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barnum v. Barnum · Murray v. Supreme Lodge, New England Order of Protection · State v. O'Day · State v. Savage · State v. Kline
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining what is jurisdiction pertaining to probate courts under the constitution, it is necessary to consider what jurisdiction probate courts had at the time the constitution was framed and adopted, as it is presumed the phrase ‘pertaining to probate courts’ was used in that instrument in the sense in which it was accepted in Oregon at that time.” (Citing Adams v. Lewis, supra.) State v. McDonald, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.