Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 P3D 726 - Potter v. Potter

Potter v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth Services · Bennett v. Bennett · Turinsky v. Long · Morino v. Swayman · Karpuleon v. Karpuleon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requires, at a minimum, that parties be notified of the subject of proceedings concerning them so that they will have a reasonable opportunity to be heard.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Ordinarily, when parties informally agree to make a change in decreed custody or visitation that is not merely temporary or experimental, the change should be reflected both in a changed custody or visitation order and in a changed child support order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was given no notice that modification of decreed visitation was at issue-indeed, based on the court's rulings, both parties reasonably expected that decreed visitation would not be at issue”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.