Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 So. 2d 559 - Hearn v. State

55 So. 2d 559 - Hearn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably 223 Pa. Super. 60 - Commonwealth v. Lockhart (1972), Commonwealth v. Donovan (1985)

1 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

24019511960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 54 So. 2d 651 - Hearn v. State · Green v. State · State v. Akers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Larceny is an offense against the public, that is against the State, and the offense is the same whether the property stolen belongs to one person or several persons jointly or to several persons each owning separate parts thereof. The names of the owners of the stolen property constitute no part of the offense. They are stated in the information primarily as a matter of description for the purpose of identification and to show ownership in a person or persons other than the accused.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is the law in the State of Florida that where several items are taken at the same time and place as one continuous act, the offense is a single theft.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the nine cows and the two calves were all on the same open range, were rounded up at the same time, were placed in the same truck by the defendants at the same time from the same loading pen. The cattle were all grazing in and around the same area, and apparently were not too far separated by distance, because the act of rounding up, loading, etc., consumed only a few minutes of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.