55 So. 3d 515 - Hodges v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ring v. Arizona · Atkins v. Virginia · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon · Keener v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“supported himself at times by working labor jobs, such as working for Ben Thomas’s masonry business. In that position, Hodges was able to mix mortar with the appropriate amount of sand, cut bricks, drive Thomas’s truck, and obtain lunch for the other employees. Hodges used hydraulic lifts, gas and electric saws, masonry drills, and Thomas’s credit card. Evidence also showed that Hodges supervised, albeit apparently without an official “supervisor” title, a night-shift cleaning crew.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arbelaez v. Crews
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.