State v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1963
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boyer & Lucas v. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. · Conness v. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railroad · City of San Antonio v. Fike · Routh v. Texas Traction Co. · Illinois, Iowa & Minnesota Railway Co. v. Humiston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“What amount, in dollars and cents, do you find, from a preponderance of the evidence, that the remainder of the R. B. Carpenter farm will be reduced in market value by the condemnation of the 8-3/100 acres of land, if any?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carpenter“but these matters can only be considered by you as affecting the market value of the land, if they do affect it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carpenter“as a part of the entire tract of which it forms a part,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carpenter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.