Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 SW3D 350 - State v. Driscoll

State v. Driscoll’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · Diaz v. United States · Henderson v. Brown · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was 'outcome determinative,' that is, whether 'the erroneously admitted evidence so influenced the jury that, when considered with and balanced against all the evidence properly admitted, there is a reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different conclusion but for the erroneously admitted evidence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an otherwise valid conviction should not be set aside if the reviewing court may confidently say, on the whole record, that the constitutional error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.