Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

55 S.W.3d 624

Strnad v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 19, 2001

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 2001-09-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2001

1 state decisions

Relies on Vidaurri v. State · Strnad v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-09-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

¶2The opinion of the Court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

¶3Appellant pleaded guilty to indecency with a child and was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision, pursuant to a plea agreement. Six years later, the trial court adjudicated Appellant’s guilt and sentenced him to confinement for five years. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal. The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Strnad v. State, 39 S.W.3d 363 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 2001). The court held that Appellant could not raise issues on appeal because the notice of appeal did not comply with Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(b)(3). Appellant has filed a petition for discretionary review complaining of the Court of Appeals holding.

¶4We recently reconsidered the applicability of Rule 25.2(b)(3) to appeals from the adjudication of guilt. Vidaurri v. State, 49 S.W.3d 880 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). The Court of Appeals did not have the benefit of this recent decision when it issued its opinion. We grant grounds one, two, and three of Appellant’s PDR and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Vidaurri. The remaining grounds are refused.

/55/sw3d/624 · .json · Public domain