Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 SW3D 838 - Clements v. Moore

Clements v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 103 Wash. 2d 131 - Ueland v. Pengo Hydra-Pull Corp. · Reagan v. Vaughn · HOWARD FRANK, MD, PC v. Superior Court · Weitl v. Moes · Audubon-Exira Ready Mix, Inc. v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the recognition of filial claims for wrongful death is one exclusively within the purview of the Legislature.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “claim of loss of parental Consortium is a reciprocal of the claim of the parents for loss of a child's consortium ... in K.R.S. § 411.135”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Kentucky recognizes the claim of minor children for loss of parental consortium.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.