Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 UTAH 384 - Cram v. Reynolds

Cram v. Reynolds’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1973
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1973

7 state decisions

201919192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [W]hen in an equity case findings of fact are clearly not, in our opinion, justified by the evidence, it is our duty to arrive at the conclusion we think is compelled by the proof, regardless of the opinion of the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.