Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Va. App. 122 - Perry v. Commonwealth

55 Va. App. 122 - Perry v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Chimel v. California · Ornelas v. United States · Ybarra v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is the settled rule that how erroneous soever may be the reasons of the court for its judgment upon the face of the judgment itself, if the judgment be right, it will not be disturbed on account of the reasons”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the parties here were aware at all stages of this case that the courts would look to the Fourth Amendment to determine if Trooper Weidhaas's actions were appropriate—regardless of whether the question involved probable cause or reasonable articulable suspicion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “certainly had probable cause to believe that [Perry] possessed illegal drugs—either by having joint or constructive possession of the drugs originally in Sprurgeon's hand or by having actual possession of other drugs that the officer had not yet seen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.