Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Wash. App. 13 - State v. Hays

55 Wash. App. 13 - State v. Hays’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. Lockhart · 89 Wash. 2d 38 - State v. Blight · 96 Wash. 2d 31 - State v. Cunningham · 38 Wash. App. 831 - State v. Toomey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “manifestly unreasonable, or exercised on untenable grounds, or for untenable reasons.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “consider whether the offender and the community will benefit from use of this special sexual offender sentencing alternative and consider the victim’s opinion whether the offender should receive a treatment disposition under this subsection. If the court determines that this special sex offender sentencing alternative is appropriate, the court shall then impose a sentence within the sentence range.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the court may suspend the execution of the sentence and place the offender on community supervision for up to two years”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.