55 Wash. App. 300 - State v. Lass’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2014
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Trop v. Dulles · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 103 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Campbell · 92 Wash. 2d 671 - State v. Johnson · Roscoe v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an additional conviction cannot be allowed to stand unless it involves some injury to the person or property of the victim or others, which is separate and distinct from and not merely incidental to the crime of which it forms an element.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lu · State v. L.U.“The mere appearance of vindictiveness is insufficient to establish a due process violation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no additional steps were necessary to complete both charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.