Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Wash. App. 387 - Gjerde v. Fritzsche

55 Wash. App. 387 - Gjerde v. Fritzsche’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2014

13 state decisions

701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Whitworth Bros. Storage Co. · 110 Wash. 2d 32 - State v. Ng · Stancill v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. · Skillin v. Kimball · 70 Wash. 2d 173 - Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[p]roper respect for the jury verdict and for the court's responsibility to manage its caseload fairly and expeditiously militate against such a course.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen the answers [to the jury interrogatories] are inconsistent with each other and one or more is likewise inconsistent with the general verdict, judgment shall not be entered, but the court shall return the jury for further consideration of its answers and verdict or shall order a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[s]uch silence in the face of actual knowledge of an inconsistency at a time it could be cured waives the issue on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.