55 Wash. App. 459 - State v. Raines’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Tierney ex rel. Newton v. Davidson (1998), State v. Bustamante-Davila (1999)
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bumper v. North Carolina · 106 Wash. 2d 144 - State v. Stroud · 100 Wash. 2d 814 - State v. Chrisman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he fact that the occupants appeared to be unharmed when the officers entered did not guarantee that the disturbance had cooled to the point where their continued safety was assured. Until they had an opportunity to observe [the boyfriend] and talk to him, they had no knowledge of his condition and state of mind.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[p]olice officers responding to a domestic violence report have a duty to ensure the present and continued safety and well-being of the occupants.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Whether a police officer's acts in the face of a perceived emergency were objectively reasonable is a matter to be evaluated in relation to the scene as it reasonably appeared to the officer at the time, 'not as it may seem to a scholar after the event with the benefit of leisured retrospective analysis.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Schultz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.