55 Wash. App. 562 - State v. Jackmon’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 108 Wash. 2d 458 - State v. McAlpin · 46 Wash. App. 388 - State v. Gonzales · 43 Wash. App. 340 - State v. Harp · 53 Wash. App. 916 - State v. Crutchfield
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he defendant used his or her position of trust ... to facilitate the commission of the current offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“more vulnerable to the particular offense than a nondisabled victim would have been.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“whether or not the victim was more vulnerable to the offense than other victims due to extreme youth, advanced age, disability, or ill health and whether the defendant knew of that vulnerability. Accordingly, the mens rea element of the crime with which the defendant is charged has no relevance; instead, what is critical is whether the defendant knew or should have known of the victim's vulnerability, and whether the particular vulnerability was a substantial factor in accomplishment of the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.