55 Wash. App. 588 - State v. Shupe’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 103 Wash. 2d 361 - State v. Cord · 110 Wash. 2d 706 - State v. Murray · 45 Wash. App. 528 - State v. Payne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he current offense involved a high degree of sophistication or planning or occurred over a lengthy period of time or involved a broad geographic area of disbursement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[w]hen appellant's operation is compared with those described in numerous Washington cases, [appellant's] operation appears rather typical.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“was typical of other indoor growing operations. This is not the proper inquiry. For purposes of imposing an exceptional sentence, the statute states that an offense is a major violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act when it is more onerous than the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.