55 Wash. App. 834 - State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tate v. United States · 103 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Campbell · 98 Wash. 2d 140 - State v. Parris · Roscoe v. Arizona · 89 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(h) Continuances. Continuances or other delays may be granted as follows: (2) On motion of the prosecuting authority, the court or a party, the court may continue the case when required in the administration of justice and the defendant will not be substantially prejudiced in the presentation of his or her defense. The motion must be filed on or before the date set for trial or the last day of any continuance or extension granted pursuant to this rule. The court must state on the record or in writing the reasons for the continuance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.