McKindly v. Dunham’s Empirical Analysis
1882
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 1919
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To this extent (i. e., of taking orders) they authorized him and trusted him; but they might not have been willing to trust him further with a large and dangerous power of receiving payments.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.