Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 55 Wis. 2d 385 - John Miller Supply Co. v. Western State Bank

55 Wis. 2d 385 - John Miller Supply Co. v. Western State Bank’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
7
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Mitchell Bank v. Schanke (2004), 141 Wis. 2d 867 - Schmitz v. Grudzinski (1987)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

26019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Capocasa v. First National Bank of Stevens Point · Angers v. Sabatinelli

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where [the other indebtedness] is antecedent it must be identified in clear terms, and where it is subsequent, it must be of the same class as the primary obligation secured by the instrument and so related to it that the consent of the debtor to its inclusion may be inferred."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), a security agreement may provide that any or all obligations covered by the security agreement are to be secured by after-acquired collateral. (2) No security interest attaches under an after-acquired property clause to consumer goods other than accessions (section 75-9-314) when given as additional security unless the debtor acquires rights in them within ten (10) days after the secured party gives value. (3) Obligations covered by a security agreement may include future advances or other value whether or not the advances or value are given pursuant to commitment (section 75-9-105(1)).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Applying these generally accepted rules to the instant case, the liability or obligation asserted 'in the plaintiffs complaint ... was not within the clear contemplation and intent of the parties in the agreement of March 11,1966 and the-subsequent contingent liabilities are not of the same nature or related to the types of indebtedness involved in the original financing agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.