In re Arkuszewski’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Russello v. United States · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“eligibility to be a debtor under a particular chapter of the Bankruptcy Code is not the equivalent of a jurisdictional question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Fishel“court may properly dismiss a petition at a later date if it is determined that the debtor is ineligible under § 109.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Fishel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.