Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 550 F.3d 270 - Vazquez v. Wilson

Vazquez v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

550 F.3d 270 · 2008

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2023

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

190200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Woodford v. Visciotti · Early v. Packer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he co-defendant’s statement here was redacted to replace references to appellant by name with the term ‘the other man.' Although this was not the type of redaction at issue in Gray, the Gray Court's reasoning, including its distinction of Richardson, leaves little question that this sort of redaction is appropriate under the Sixth Amendment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “came close to endorsing a bright-line rule that when terms like 'my boy,' the ‘other guy,’ or the ‘other man' are used to substitute for an actual name in a statement admitted at trial there cannot be a Bruton violation” and holding that, although such terms will”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.