Sam v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A finding of “not disabled” is therefore appropriate under the framework of the above cited rule. The claimant was not under a disability, as defined in the Social Security Act, at any time from October 1, 2002, the alleged onset date, through June 30, 2008, the date last insured ...”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Diedrich v. Berryhill

2. “After careful consideration of all the evidence, the undersigned concludes the claimant was not under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act ...”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Diedrich v. Berryhill

3. “there was either an explicit ALJ finding or substantial evidence that the claimant was disabled at some point after the date last insured,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Rossiter v. SSA