Floyd v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity · Kirk v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Cutler v. Weinberger · Cowart v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“AU: Now, Mrs. Floyd, you were advised in the Notice of Hearing of your right to be represented at this hearing. Since you are appearing without a representative, I assume that you do not wish to be so represented. Is that correct? CLMT: No. I did want to get a lawyer, but I tried to see one, and the price that he charged, I couldn’t afford it, and I said, 'Well, I just hope by the grace of God I'll just try to go along and do what I could.’ AU: All right. CLMT: So— AU: Then you’d like to proceed without an attorney at this time? CLMT: I have made notes about — well, this is my (inaudible). AU: No. No. Just — we’ll get to your testimony in a few minutes. CLMT: Oh. ALJ: But right now let me finish my opening statement. CLMT: All right. ALJ: You do wish to proceed without an attorney at this time? Is that correct? CLMT: Yes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.