United States v. E-Gold, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 18 U.S.C. § 1955 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1960 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 31 U.S.C. § 5312 · 31 U.S.C. § 5313
Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Duncan v. Walker · Russello v. United States · United States v. Harriss · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the definition of a term in the definitional section of a statute controls the construction of that term,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.